A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual size of service pretty much violates your entire service composition as a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention on the law nor in the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-area duties while in the interim period. Read more
The official court record is maintained by the court of record. Copies of case file documents will not be available about the search check here site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually actually pretty obscure about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the 90-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name over the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the acquired counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more